Full text not available for this opinion.
Carlson v. Landon
342 U.S. 524 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 10, 1952
Cited by (872)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)
- Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)
- Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217 (1960)
- Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 (1959)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281 (2018)
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471 (1999)
- Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590 (1953)
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984)
This opinion cites
- Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944)
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951)
- Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951)
- Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1 (1952)
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935)
- Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 (1951)
- American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 (1950)
- Bridges v. California, 314 U.S. 252 (1941)
- Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1951)
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936)
- Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 (1944)
- Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524 (1952)
- Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118 (1943)
- Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Wayman v. Southard, 23 U.S. 1 (1825) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Carlson v. Landon with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.