Full text not available for this opinion.
Zadvydas v. Davis
533 U.S. 678 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 28, 2001
Cited by (3,135)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
- Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. 120 (2017)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281 (2018)
- Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510 (2003)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)
- In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L., 56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 19 (2012) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010)
- Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371 (2005)
- People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168 (2013) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 177 L. Ed. 2d 355 (2010) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
- Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972)
- United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987)
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445 (1985)
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)
- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982)
- Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (1953)
- Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997)
- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983)
- Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 (1932)
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991)
- Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972)
Research Zadvydas v. Davis with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.