Full text not available for this opinion.
United States v. Scheffer
523 U.S. 303 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 31, 1998
Cited by (1,883)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (1998)
- Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital Center, 156 F.3d 1284 (1998)
- United States v. Richard Junior Frazier, 387 F.3d 1244 (2004)
- State v. Rice, 2006 Tenn. LEXIS 125 (2006)
- People v. Maury, 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 561 (2003)
- Fry v. Pliler, 551 U.S. 112 (2007)
- Ross v. State, 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 819 (2004) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Hammer v. State, 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 513 (2009) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Potier v. State, 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33 (2002) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
- United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984)
- Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974)
- Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973)
- Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983)
- General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997)
- Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (1923)
- Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (1967)
- Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200 (1987)
- Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986)
- Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 (1987)
- In Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)
- Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988)
- United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (1998)
Research United States v. Scheffer with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.