Full text not available for this opinion.
Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
509 U.S. 86 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 18, 1993
Cited by (1,476)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2004)
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415 (1996)
- Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994)
- Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005)
- Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190 (2016)
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc., 11 Cal. 4th 1 (1995)
- Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48 (2002)
- Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86 (1993)
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995)
- In re Marriage of LaFleur & Pyfer, 2021 CO 3 (2021) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
- Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
- Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
- United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967)
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
- Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993)
- Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989)
- Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967)
- Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
- Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964)
- Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965)
- M'culloch v. State of Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
- Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967)
Research Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.