Full text not available for this opinion.
Bourjaily v. United States
483 U.S. 171 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 23, 1987
Cited by (3,375)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
- Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)
- Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006)
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996)
- United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1 (1990)
- Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 (1987)
- Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 (1988)
- Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 (1990)
- Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990)
- White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 (1992)
This opinion cites
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation, 475 U.S. 574 (1986)
- In Re WINSHIP, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
- Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (1942)
- Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980)
- United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
- Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986)
- United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974)
- California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)
- Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)
- Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 (1987)
- Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 (1972)
- Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 (1970)
- Lee v. Illinois, 476 U.S. 530 (1986)
- United States v. Inadi, 475 U.S. 387 (1986)
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne Whitmore, 590 F.2d 575 (1979) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Bourjaily v. United States with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.