Full text not available for this opinion.
Gannett Co. v. DePasquale
443 U.S. 368 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided July 2, 1979
Cited by (1,516)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 (1980)
- Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984)
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980)
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty., 464 U.S. 501 (1984)
- Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20 (1984)
- Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707 (1980)
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of Norfolk, 457 U.S. 596 (1982)
- Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987)
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 U.S. 1 (1986)
- Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368 (1979)
This opinion cites
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)
- Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
- Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964)
- Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935)
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978)
- Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
- Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
- Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961)
- Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966)
- Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974)
- Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977)
- Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974)
- Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)
- Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972)
Research Gannett Co. v. DePasquale with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.