Full text not available for this opinion.
Crist v. Bretz
437 U.S. 28 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 14, 1978
Cited by (1,369)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989)
- McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
- United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117 (1980)
- Crist v. Bretz, 437 U.S. 28 (1978)
- Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40 (1981) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon, 466 U.S. 294 (1984) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Ex Parte Lewis, 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33 (2007) · on the MayaClerk platform
- State v. Curcio, 191 Conn. 27 (1983) · on the MayaClerk platform
- State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St. 3d 420 (2008) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, 537 U.S. 101 (2003) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978)
- Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1965)
- Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969)
- Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
- Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)
- Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963)
- Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184 (1957)
- Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
- United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470 (1971)
- United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. 579 (1824)
- Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970)
- Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684 (1949)
- United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600 (1976)
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S. 564 (1977)
- Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458 (1973)
Research Crist v. Bretz with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.