Full text not available for this opinion.
Zablocki v. Redhail
434 U.S. 374 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 18, 1978
Cited by (1,575)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987)
- Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984)
- Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983)
- United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388 (1980)
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993)
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350 (1989)
- Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)
- Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978)
- Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541 (1999)
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990)
This opinion cites
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976)
- Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
- Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976)
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
- Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973)
- Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970)
- Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956)
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)
- Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878)
- Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923)
- Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)
- Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971)
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 (1955)
Research Zablocki v. Redhail with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.