Full text not available for this opinion.
Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County
415 U.S. 250 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 26, 1974
Cited by (975)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 (1976)
- Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393 (1975)
- Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980)
- Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992)
- Heckler v. Ringer, 466 U.S. 602 (1984)
- Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978)
- Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976)
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 (1981)
- Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974)
- Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party, 440 U.S. 173 (1979)
This opinion cites
- Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
- Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970)
- Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)
- Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 (1971)
- Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969)
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963)
- Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954)
- Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972)
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337 (1969)
- Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 (1960)
- Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971)
- Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973)
- Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966)
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969)
Research Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.