The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman

411 F.2d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 7, 1969

Cited by (3,039)

Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.

• Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000)
• National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990, 430 F.2d 966 (1970)
• The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (1969)
• Piotrowski v. City of Houston, 237 F.3d 567 (2001)
• Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company, 37 F.3d 603 (1994)
• Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp., 4 F.3d 1153 (1993)
• Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F.2d 764 (1991)
• Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield College, 88 F.3d 300 (1996) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Laxton v. Gap Inc., 333 F.3d 572 (2003) · on the MayaClerk platform
• , 896 F.2d 116 (1990) · on the MayaClerk platform

This opinion cites

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
• Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (1942)
• The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (1969)
• Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 (1932)
• Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 352 U.S. 500 (1957)
• Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645 (1946)
• Quercia v. United States, 289 U.S. 466 (1933)
• Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690 (1962)
• Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (1958)
• Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co., 321 U.S. 29 (1944)
• Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935)
• Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 372 U.S. 108 (1963)
• Improvement Company v. Munson, 81 U.S. 442 (1872) · on the MayaClerk platform
• United States v. Murdock, 290 U.S. 389 (1934)
• Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U.S. 90 (1930) · on the MayaClerk platform

Full text of the opinion

Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.