Full text not available for this opinion.
South Carolina v. Katzenbach
383 U.S. 301 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 2, 1966
Cited by (1,214)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970)
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001)
- City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)
- Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976)
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978)
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981)
- Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 (2000)
- Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973)
- United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000)
- New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992)
This opinion cites
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
- M'culloch v. State of Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
- Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
- McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961)
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 (1955)
- Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)
- Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944)
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
- Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923)
- United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17 (1960)
- United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941)
- Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960)
- Tot v. United States, 319 U.S. 463 (1943)
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966)
- Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943)
Research South Carolina v. Katzenbach with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.