Full text not available for this opinion.
Ungar v. Sarafite
376 U.S. 575 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 4, 1964
Cited by (2,241)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- In Interest of Tiffany Marie S., 196 W. Va. 223 (1996)
- Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 (1975)
- Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575 (1964)
- Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1 (1983)
- State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42 (1987)
- Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (1968)
- State v. Unger, 67 Ohio St. 2d 65 (1981)
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., 556 U.S. 868 (2009)
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989)
- People v. Frye, 18 Cal. 4th 894 (1998)
This opinion cites
- Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927)
- In Re Murchison., 349 U.S. 133 (1955)
- In Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)
- Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575 (1964)
- Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11 (1954)
- Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517 (1925)
- Avery v. Alabama, 308 U.S. 444 (1940)
- Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204 (1821) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Ex Parte Terry, 128 U.S. 289 (1888) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Chandler v. Warden Fretag, 348 U.S. 3 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Sacher v. United States, 343 U.S. 1 (1952) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Nilva v. United States, 352 U.S. 385 (1957) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Fisher v. Pace, 336 U.S. 155 (1949) · on the MayaClerk platform
- In Re Green, 369 U.S. 689 (1962) · on the MayaClerk platform
- United States v. George v. Arlen, 252 F.2d 491 (1958) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Ungar v. Sarafite with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.