Lawn v. United States

355 U.S. 339 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 3, 1958

Cited by (1,069)

Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.

• Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962)
• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970)
• United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (1985)
• United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)
• Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973)
• Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794 (1989)
• Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343 (1965)
• Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 (1958)
• United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 (1993)
• Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, 228 F.3d 178 (2000) · on the MayaClerk platform

This opinion cites

• Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946)
• McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943)
• Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939)
• Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956)
• Gouled v. United States, 255 U.S. 298 (1921)
• Holt v. United States, 218 U.S. 245 (1910)
• Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943)
• Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 (1958)
• McClellan v. Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (1910) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Sinclair v. United States, 279 U.S. 263 (1929) · on the MayaClerk platform
• United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United States, 330 U.S. 395 (1947) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Husty v. United States, 282 U.S. 694 (1931) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 1 (1956) · on the MayaClerk platform
• Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221 (1929) · on the MayaClerk platform

Full text of the opinion

Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.