Full text not available for this opinion.
Robertson v. Wegmann
436 U.S. 584 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 31, 1978
Cited by (879)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90 (1980)
- Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 (1985)
- Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980)
- Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (1983)
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247 (1981)
- Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 (1980)
- Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc., 589 F.3d 626 (2009)
- Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988)
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715 (1979)
This opinion cites
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)
- Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
- Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)
- Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
- Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247 (1978)
- Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 (1971)
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala., 353 U.S. 448 (1957)
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 421 U.S. 454 (1975)
- Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693 (1973)
- Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972)
- United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943)
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 383 U.S. 696 (1966)
- Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. 1 (1842)
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 396 U.S. 229 (1969)
Research Robertson v. Wegmann with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.