Full text not available for this opinion.
Affronti v. United States
350 U.S. 79 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 5, 1955
Cited by (1,330)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. State, 660 So. 2d 1189 (1995)
- In the Interest of J.F.C., 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 328 (2002)
- United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 (1960)
- People v. Albanese, 104 Ill. 2d 504 (1984)
- Rylander v. State, 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 66 (2003)
- State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 (1964)
- United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178 (1979)
- People v. Trakhtenberg, 493 Mich. 38 (2012)
- People v. Wiedemer, 17 Brief Times Rptr. 762 (1993) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Ex Parte United States, 242 U.S. 27 (1916) · on the MayaClerk platform
- United States v. Murray, 275 U.S. 347 (1928) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Phillips v. United States, 212 F.2d 327 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Kirk v. United States, 185 F.2d 185 (1950) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Roy L. Mann v. United States, 218 F.2d 936 (1955) · on the MayaClerk platform
- White v. Steigleder, 37 F.2d 858 (1930) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Kelley v. United States, 209 F.2d 638 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
- United States v. Bernett, 123 F. Supp. 841 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Lonnie Affronti v. United States, 221 F.2d 150 (1955) · on the MayaClerk platform
- United States v. Soeder, 120 F. Supp. 594 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Affronti v. United States with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.