Full text not available for this opinion.
Ogden v. Saunders
25 U.S. 213 · Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1827
Cited by (997)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- Butner v. United States, 440 U.S. 48 (1979)
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936)
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977)
- Eisner v. MacOmber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920)
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1 (1977)
- Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)
- Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmber, 252 U.S. 189 (1919) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Galvan v. Press, 347 U.S. 522 (1954) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. 87 (1810)
- Bank of Columbia v. Okely, 17 U.S. 122 (1819) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Renner v. Bank of Columbia, 22 U.S. 581 (1824) · on the MayaClerk platform
- McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 159 (1819) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Somerville's Executors v. Hamilton, 17 U.S. 230 (1819) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Blanchard v. Russell, 13 Mass. 1 (1816) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Baker v. Wheaton, 5 Mass. 509 (1809) · on the MayaClerk platform
- M'millan v. M'neill, 17 U.S. 209 (1819) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Bradley v. McKee, 3 F. Cas. 1156 (1837) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Holmes v. Lessee of Holmes, 5 Binn. 252 (1812) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Ogden v. Saunders with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.