Full text not available for this opinion.
Johnson v. State
1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided April 15, 1998
Cited by (1,888)
Most-cited subsequent opinions citing this case. The full citation network — every citing opinion with the citing passages — is available on the MayaClerk platform.
- King v. State, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 96 (2000)
- Ladd v. State, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 110 (1999)
- Motilla v. State, 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 137 (2002)
- Solomon v. State, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49 (2001)
- Jackson v. State, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 55 (2000)
- Taylor v. State, 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1627 (2008) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Morales v. State, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (2000) · on the MayaClerk platform
- McDonald v. State, 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2010 (2005) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Ibarra v. State, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 117 (1999) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Kutzner v. State, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 71 (1999) · on the MayaClerk platform
This opinion cites
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979)
- In Re WINSHIP, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
- King v. State, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 71 (1997)
- Moreno v. State, 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 138 (1988)
- Coit v. State, 808 S.W.2d 473 (1991) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Gardner v. State, 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1472 (1985) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Wood v. State, 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1790 (1974) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Young v. State, 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 112 (1994) · on the MayaClerk platform
- Phea v. State, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 484 (1989) · on the MayaClerk platform
Research Johnson v. State with AI
Search 10.6 million opinions, walk the full citation graph with passages, and get cited answers from an AI research assistant. Free tier: 40 searches/month, no card required.
Create a free accountFull text of the opinion
Source: public court records. Text provided as published by the court; formatting may differ from the official reporter. This page is legal information, not legal advice.