MayaClerk

MayaClerk vs. LexisNexis

Last updated July 2026 · LexisNexis figures from published rates and independent reporting; verify current pricing with the vendor.

LexisNexis and Westlaw split the institutional legal research market between them, and the honest summary of both is the same: comprehensive, editorially rich, and priced for organizations rather than individuals. This page covers what changes when you run the same research on MayaClerk.

Pricing, side by side

MayaClerkLexisNexis
Entry priceFree — 40 searches/month, no card, no time limitPublished entry plans around $114/month for a solo
Realistic working spend$20/month (Pro) · $100/month (Pro Plus)Commonly $200–$300/month once jurisdiction add-ons, full Shepard's history, and secondary sources are included
Generative AI researchDavid assistant included in Pro and Pro PlusLexis+ AI priced for enterprise; reported around $17,500/year per reporting on enterprise agreements
ContractMonth-to-monthTypically annual or multi-year terms
Jurisdiction coverageAll federal and state courts in every planTiered by jurisdiction; add-ons raise the effective price

What's equivalent, what isn't

Primary law research: equivalent job, different mechanics. MayaClerk's corpus is 10.6 million federal and state opinions with 100M+ indexed passages. Hybrid semantic + full-text retrieval means natural-language issue queries work as well as Boolean-style precision searches. For the core loop of a litigator's research — find the controlling cases, read them, chase the citations — the two platforms do the same job, and MayaClerk's semantic layer often surfaces analogous cases a keyword query misses.

Citator: graph vs. editorial. Shepard's gives you editor-assigned treatment signals. MayaClerk gives you the complete citing-opinion graph with the citing passages in front of you. The tradeoff is real: Shepard's is faster to skim; the graph is primary evidence rather than an editor's summary. Careful practitioners verify flags by reading citing language anyway — on MayaClerk that verification step is the interface.

Secondary sources: LexisNexis wins. Matthew Bender treatises, practice guides, and law reviews have no MayaClerk equivalent. If secondary sources anchor your workflow, keep access to them.

Beyond search, MayaClerk adds litigation dossiers — adversarially-tested research memos on a specific claim at $39 à la carte — and a flat-rate research API ($0.20/call) that LexisNexis has no comparable self-serve offer for.

The buyer this comparison is really for

If you're at a firm where someone else pays the Lexis bill, this page changes nothing for you. If you are the person paying — solo attorney, small firm managing partner, freelance paralegal, contract researcher, pro se litigant — the question is whether editor-written signals and treatises are worth roughly ten times the subscription cost. For practices centered on primary law, they usually aren't.

Frequently asked questions

Does MayaClerk include statutes?

Yes — federal statutory material is browsable and linked from opinions, alongside the case law corpus.

Can I export or cite-check a brief?

Opinions carry full citations, and David produces cited answers with pinpoint references you can verify in one click. Dossiers arrive as structured documents with every quote verified against the source opinion.

What happens if I cancel?

Your plan lapses at the end of the billing month and the free tier keeps working. There's no contract exit process because there's no contract.

Same research, a tenth of the bill

Start free — 40 searches/month across every U.S. jurisdiction. Upgrade to Pro for $20/month when you need more.

Create a free account